نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران؛ Alireza.norozi@gmail.com
2 دانشجوی دکترا حقوق بین الملل،دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران؛ Hesamdidgah@hotmail.com
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The international armed forces and humanitarian law (a branch of international law) has not allowed to the both parties of the conflict to resort to any weapons or warfare to advance its war goals and programs. From the very beginning of this law in the modern age, it has sought to forbid the rival forces to use the weapons and methods that cause pain, suffering and inflicting unnecessary damages in order to minimize the suffering and the other effects of war. The question is that: can military necessities justify the use of the prohibited devices and unauthorized methods in the war campaign scene? From the humanitarian perspective, the only legitimate aim of armed hostilities is to stop the enemy's combat power and to bring the combatant out of the war and continue the campaign. But, the use of inappropriate combat methods and tools and the use of banned and inhumane weapons, even from the perspective of necessity is unjustified.
The lack of clarity in the meaning of this principle and the lack of clarification of the limits of "military necessity" have led to numerous challenges and harms in the field of international and domestic hostilities. Military necessity is an urgent, unavoidable need to be taken by a commander to promptly surrender and stop an enemy by using legal and controlled means and equipment. However, this article seeks to find out the nature and scope of military necessity in international humanitarian law and its position by attending to the prohibited means and methods in the law of armed conflict by examining the case of the Iraq war against Iran.
کلیدواژهها [English]
کتب
مقالات
1- رضایی، صالح (1392)؛ عراق و میزان پای بندی آن به حقوق مخاصمات مسلحانه و بشردوستانه در جریان جنگ هشت ساله، پژوهشگاه علوم و معارف دفاع مقدس.
2- شافع، میرشهبیز (1380)؛ عملکرد جمهوری اسلامی ایران در طول جنگ عراق و ایران با توجه به پروتکل اول ژنو 1977، مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، شماره 51.
3-ای.اف.اچ.پست (1369)؛ جنگ عراق علیه ایران از دیدگاه حقوق بینالملل، واحد ترجمه دفتر خدمات حقوق بینالملل، مجله حقوق بینالمللی، شماره 13.
4- شریفی طرازکوهی، حسین (1373)؛ حقوق جنگ دریایی و عملکرد جمهوری اسلامی ایران در طول جنگ عراق و ایران، مجلهی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، شماره 32.
5-زمانی، قاسم (1378)؛ حقوق بشردوستانه بینالمللی و اشغال سرزمینهای ایران در جنگ تحمیلی، مجله سیاست دفاعی، شماره 28، 1378.
منابع انگلیسی
کتب
1-Boivin, Alexandra:The Legal Regime Applicable to Targeting Military Objectives in the Context of Contemporary Warfare, Collection des travaux de recherche, 2006
2-Gardam, Judith: Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY,2004.
3-Jinks, Derek:THE TEMPORAL SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN CONTEMPORARY CONFLICTS, HARVARD PROGRAM ON HUMANITARIAN POLICY AND CONFLICT RESEARCH,2003.
4-Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, U.S. War Dep’t General Orders No. 100,Apr. 24, 1863. (Lieber Code)
5-Joseph Perkovich, GUERILLA PARTIES CONSIDERED WITH REFERENCE TO THE LAWS AND USAGES OF WAR,Lawbook Exch. 2005.
6-Yoram Dinstein, The Conduct of Hostilities Under the Law of International Armed Conflict,2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
7-Christopher Greenwood, ‘Historical Development and Legal Basis’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press,2008.
8-Major Geoffrey S.Corn.International and Operational Law Note, Principle 1:Military Necessity, ARMY LAW, Jul. 1998.
9-Anthony Cullen , The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law,Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, 2010.
10-J. Plctet, Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law,Martinus Nijhoff,1985.
11-M.Greenspan,The Modern Law of Land Warfare,University of California Press,1959.
12-H.McCourbey,International Humanitarian Law,Dartmouth, 1990.
13-JIRI TOMAN,THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT,1996.
14-Dietrich Schindler & Jiri Toman,THE LAWS OF ARMED CONFLICTS, 4th ed, 2004.
15-PATRICK BOYLAN, REVIEW OF THE CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT,1993.
16-Mollard Bannelier, La protection de l'environnement en temps de conflit armé ,2001.
مقالات:
1-Melzer,nils:TARGETED KILLING OR LESS HARMFUL MEANS? - ISRAEL'S HIGH COURT JUDGMENT ON TARGETED KILLING AND THE RESTRICTIVE FUNCTION OF MILITARY NECESSITY,Yearbook of
International Humanitarian Law,volume 6,2006.
2-Alan reby,major kemneth: bombardment of land taroers-military necessity and proportionality interpellaied, April 1968.
3-Van Bergen, Jennifer - Gittings Jr, Charles B: Bush War: Military Necessity or War Crimes?, July 2003.
4-G Draper, ‘Military Necessity and Humanitarian Imperatives’, 12 Revue de Droit Pénal Militaire et Droit de la Guerre, 1973.
5-Elmar Rauch, ‘Le Concept de Necessité Militaire dans le Droit de la Guerre’, 19 Mil L & L War Re,1980.
6-Bosco, David:moral principle vs. military necessity, The American Scholar, Volume 77, No.1, Winter 2008.
7-J.S. FORREST, CRAIG: THE DOCTRINE OF MILITARY NECESSITY AND THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY DURING ARMED CONFLICTS,CALIFORNIA WESTERN INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL,VOLUME 37, SPRING 2007.
8- Gregory A Raymond, ‘Military Necessity and the War Against Global Terrorism’ in Howard M.Hensel (ed), The Law of Armed Conflict: Constraints on the Contemporary Use of Military Force, 2005.
9-Hayashi, Nobuo: REQUIREMENTS OF MILITARY NECESSITY IN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW, International Peace Research Institute
10- RICHARDS. HARTIGANL, LIEBER’s CODE AND THE LAW OF WAR,1983.
11-J.G. Fleury, Colonel:JUS IN BELLO AND MILITARY NECESSITY, Canadian Forces College, 17 November, 1998.
12-Melzer,nils:KEEPING THE BALANCE BETWEEN MILITARY NECESSITY AND HUMANITY: A RESPONSE TO FOUR CRITIQUES OF THE ICRC’S INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON THE NOTION OF
DIRECT PARTICIPATION IN HOSTILITIES, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS, Vol. 42:831, 2010.
13-Horton, Scott: Kriegsraison or Military Necessity? The Bush Administration’s Wilhelmine Attitude Towards the Conduct of War,Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 30, Issue 3, 2006.
14-M. Carnahan, Burrus: Lincoln, Lieber and the Laws of War: The Origins and Limits of the Principle of Military Necessity, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 92, No. 2. 1998.
15-Newton, Michael: Modern Military Necessity: The Role & Relevance of Military Lawyers, Vanderbilt University Law School, 2007.
16-Worski,Ericja: "Military Necessity" and "Civilian Immunity": Where is the Balance? Chinese JIL, 2003.
17- Santa Barbara,Military Necessity and the Principle of Discrimination in Just War Theory, a Kantian Test of Universality Prepared for presentation at the 2009 Conference of the Western Political Science Association Vancouver, Canada March 19-21, Yuchun Kuo Department of Political Science University of California, 2009.
18-N. SCHMITT,MICHAE:Military Necessity and Humanity in International Humanitarian Law: Preserving the Delicate Balance, VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. 50,2010.
19-Nicholson,Richard,FUNCTIONALISM’S MILITARY NECESSITY PROBLEM: EXTRATERRITORIAL HABEAS CORPUS, JUSTICE KENNEDY, BOUMEDIENE V. BUSH, AND AL MAQALEH V. GATES,FORDHAM LAW REVIE,Vol. 81,2012.
21-ETIENNE, HENRY: Le juge international et les nécessités militaires,2012.
22-Gerald Downey, Jr,William: The Law of War and Military Necessity, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 47, 1953.
23-Gillespie, Alexander:The Limits of International Environmental Law: Military Necessity v. Conservation, Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y, 2012.
24-Venturini, Gabriella: Necessity in the Law of Armed Conflict and in International Criminal Law, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law,Volume 41, 2010.
25-Dunbar NCH, ‘Military Necessity in War Crimes Trials’, 29 Brit YBIL,1952.
26- N.C.H. Dunbar, ‘The Significance of Military Necessity in the Law of War’, 55 Jurid Rev, 1955.
27-Cowling MG, ‘The Relationship Between Military Necessity and the Principle of Superfluous Injury and Unnecessary Suffering in the Law of Armed Conflict’, 25 S Afr YBIL,2001.
28- McCoubrey, ‘The Nature of the Modern Doctrine of Military Necessity’, 30 Mil. L. & L. War Rev,1991.
29- O’Brien WV, ‘The Meaning of “Military Necessity” in International Law, 1 World Polity
,1957.
30- Rauch E, ‘Le Concept de Necessité Militaire dans le Droit de la Guerre’, 19 Mil L & L War Rev,1980.
31- Raymond GA, ‘Military Necessity and the War Against Global Terrorism’ in Hensel HM(ed), The Law of Armed Conflict:Constraints on the Contemporary Use of Military Force,Ashgate,2005.
32- Paulo Bogliolo Piancastelli de Siqueira, Luís:RETHINKING MILITARY NECESSITY IN THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT, August 2012.
33- Draper G, ‘Military Necessity and Humanitarian Imperatives’, 12 Revue de Droit Pénal Militaire et Droit de la Guerre,1973.
34-Rex Zedalis,Military Necessity and Iraqi Destruction of Kuwaiti Oil, Revue Belge de Droit Intl, 1990.
35-Chris af Jochnick & Roger Normand, The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War, 35 HARV. INT'L L.J. 1994.
36-Wayne Sandholtz, The Iraqi National Museum and International Law: A Duty to Protect, 44 COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 2005.
37-Burleigh Cushing Rodick, The Doctrine of Necessity in International Law,Columbia University Press, 1928.
38-Henri Meyrowitz, The Principle of Superfluous injury or Unnecessary Suffering, INT'L Rev. RED CROSSM, 1994.
39-Rotem Giladi, ‘The Jus Ad Bellum/Jus In Bello Distinction and the Law of Occupation’,41 Israel Law Review,2008.
40-Jean Pictet, Humanitarian Law and the Protection of War Victims,Sijthoff, 1975.
41-H. McCoubrey, The Nature of the Modern Doctrine of Military Necessity, 30 REVUE DE DROIT MILITAIRE ET DE DROIT DE LA GUERRE,1991.
42-Michael N. Schmitt, Targeting and International Humanitarian Law in Afghanistan, 39 ISRAEL YEARBOOK ON HUMAN RIGHTS,2009.
43-Kunz, The Chaotic Status of the Laws of War and the Urgent Necessity for Their Revision, 45 AM. J. INT'L L,1951.
44-David Keane, The Failure to Protect Cultural Property in Wartime, 14 DE PAUL-LCA J. ART & ENT. L. & POL’Y 1,2004.
45-Joshua E. Kastenberg, The Legal Regime for Protecting Cultural Property During Armed Conflict, 42 A.F. L. REV. 277, 1997.
46-David A Meyer, The 1954 Hague Cultural Property Convention and its Emergence into Customary Interna-tional Law, 11 B.U. INT’L L.J,1993.
47-Mary Ellen O’Connell, Occupation Failures and the Legality of Armed Conflict: The Case of Iraqi Cultural Property, 9 ART ANTIQUITY & L,2004.
48-Roger O’Keefe, The Meaning of Cultural Property Under the 1954 Hague Convention, 46 NETH. INT’L L. REV, 1999.
49-Sabine von Schorlemer, Legal Changes in the Regime of the Protec-tion of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict, 9 ART ANTIQUITY, 2004.
50-Marion Forsyth, Casualties of War: The De-struction of Iraq’s Cultural Heritage as a Result of U.S. Action During and After the 1991 Gulf War, 14 DE PAUL-LCA J. ART & ENT. L. & POL’Y, 2004.
)